How many cables are required to connect four computers to each other in a mesh topology?

Meshed Topology

Like their traditional WAN counterparts, meshed VPN topologies can be implemented in a fully or partially meshed configuration. Fully meshed configurations have a large number of alternate paths to any given destination. In addition, fully meshed configurations have exceptional redundancy because every VPN device provides connections to every other VPN device. This topology was illustrated in Figure5.1. A simpler compromise is the partial-mesh topology, in which all the links are connected in a more limited fashion to other links. A partial-mesh topology is shown in Figure5.5.

Mesh topology provides an inherent advantage that there is no single point of failure. Overall performance of the setup is independent of a single node or a single system. Sites that are geographically close can communicate with each other. Its main drawback is maintenance and key maintenance. For a fully meshed network, whenever a new node is added, all the other nodes will have to be updated. Even with the replacement of traditional WAN services such as frame relay or leased lines, fully meshed topologies can be expensive to implement due to the requirement to purchase a VPN device for every link in the mesh.

Note

Another issue you should be aware of with full versus partial-mesh topology is the number of tunnels you need to configure and manage. If you have 100 sites and add one router, think of all the connections you must make to rebuild a full mesh! In essence, the partial mesh is the way you want to go, but you might see an extra hop in the route from place to place because you will no longer have a single hop to any single destination. There is always give and take. Think about what method suits your design needs, and implement that method accordingly.