What type of literature review focuses on how and this approach provides a framework of understanding at different levels?

Types of Literature Review

There are many types of literature review. The choice of a specific type depends on your research approach and design. The following types of literature review are the most popular in business studies:

Narrative literature review, also referred to as traditional literature review, critiques literature and summarizes the body of a literature. Narrative review also draws conclusions about the topic and identifies gaps or inconsistencies in a body of knowledge. You need to have a sufficiently focused research question to conduct a narrative literature review

Systematic literature review requires more rigorous and well-defined approach compared to most other types of literature review. Systematic literature review is comprehensive and details the timeframe within which the literature was selected. Systematic literature review can be divided into two categories: meta-analysis and meta-synthesis.

When you conduct meta-analysis you take findings from several studies on the same subject and analyze these using standardized statistical procedures. In meta-analysis patterns and relationships are detected and conclusions are drawn. Meta-analysis is associated with deductive research approach.

Meta-synthesis, on the other hand, is based on non-statistical techniques. This technique integrates, evaluates and interprets findings of multiple qualitative research studies. Meta-synthesis literature review is conducted usually when following inductive research approach.

Scoping literature review, as implied by its name is used to identifythe scope or coverage of a body of literature on a given topic. It has been noted that “scoping reviews are useful for examining emerging evidence when it is still unclear what other, more specific questions can be posed and valuably addressed by a more precise systematic review.”[1] The main difference between systematic and scoping types of literature review is that, systematic literature review is conducted to find answer to more specific research questions, whereas scoping literature review is conducted to explore more general research question.

Argumentative literature review, as the name implies, examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply imbedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. It should be noted that a potential for bias is a major shortcoming associated with argumentative literature review.

Integrative literature review reviews, critiques, and synthesizes secondary data about research topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. If your research does not involve primary data collection and data analysis, then using integrative literature review will be your only option.

Theoretical literature review focuses on a pool of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. Theoretical literature reviews play an instrumental role in establishing what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested.

At the earlier parts of the literature review chapter, you need to specify the type of your literature review your chose and justify your choice. Your choice of a specific type of literature review should be based upon your research area, research problem and research methods. Also, you can briefly discuss other most popular types of literature review mentioned above, to illustrate your awareness of them.

[1] Munn, A. et. al. [2018] “Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach” BMC Medical Research Methodology

My e-book, The Ultimate Guide to Writing a Dissertation in Business Studies: a step by step assistanceoffers practical assistance to complete a dissertation with minimum or no stress. The e-book covers all stages of writing a dissertation starting from the selection to the research area to submitting the completed version of the work within the deadline.

John Dudovskiy

1 What type of academic writing provides an overview of a specific topic and critically analyzes the relationship among different scholarly works and the current work? A. Article Critique Book Review C. Position Paper B. Literature Review D. Research Report 2. What type of literature review focuses on how, and this approach provides a framework of understanding at different levels? A. Historical Literature Review C. Literature or Narrative Literature Review B. Integrative Review D. Methodological Literature Review 3. What type of literature review focuses on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, and phenomena emerged in the literature? A. Historical Literature Review C. Literature or Narrative Literature Review B. Integrative Review D. Methodological Literature Review 4. What type of literature review plays an instrumental role in establishing what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested? A. Historical Literature Review C. Methodological Literature Review B. Integrative Review D. Theoretical Literature Review 5. What type of literature review generates new knowledge about a topic by reviewing, critiquing, and synthesizing representative Literature on a topic in an integrated way? A. Historical Literature Review C. Methodological Literature Review B. Integrative Review D. Theoretical Literature Review 6. What type of literature review often use as a chapter in a thesis or dissertation? A Historical Literature Review C. Literature or Narrative Literature Review B. Integrative Review D. Methodological Literature Review 7. What is refer to way of organizing by focusing on the method'? A. Chronological C. Thematic B. Methodological D. Theoretical 5. What is refer to method of organizing information arranges materials to when they were published? A Chronological C. Thematic B. Methodological D. Theoretical 9. A researcher is trying to discuss the difference between his research and the previous studies related to his topic. He is making sure that he can prove that his research has basis and unique to other previous studies. Which part of research report is he trying to accomplish? A Abstract C. Literature Review B. Introduction D. Methodology 10. Which of the following is an example of solicited extemal? A. The Literature club was having a problem racing their funds, thanks to their president's project proposal, they were able to race funds for their club activities. B. The Literature club was having a problemin racing their funds, thanks to the project proposed by the Student Council president, they were able to race funds for their club activities C. One of the Literature club members noticed the lack of students' interest in their club, so he proposed a proposal to their club president in order to raise students' awareness about their club. D. The Student Council president noticed the lack of students' interest in the Literature Club, so he proposed a proposal to the said club president in order to raise students' awareness about their club.​

1

See answer

Literature Review

A literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works. A literature review may encompasses simple a summary of key sources, but it usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories.

Writing a defective literature review is one of many ways to ruin a dissertation. This tropic gives some crucial information on how to write a high-quality dissertation literature review. A researcher cannot perform significant research without first understanding the literature in the field. Conducting a literature review is a means of demonstrating an author’s knowledge about a particular field of study, including vocabulary, theories, key variables and phenomena, and its methods and history. Gall, Borg, and Gall [1996] argue that the literature review plays a vital role in:

• Delimiting the research problem,
• Seeking new lines of inquiry,
• Avoiding fruitless approaches,
• Gaining methodological insights,
• Identifying recommendations for further research, and
• Seeking support for grounded theory.

Hart [1998] contributes additional reasons for reviewing the literature, including:

• Distinguishing what has been done from what needs to be done,
• Discovering important variables relevant to the topic,
• Synthesizing and gaining a new perspective,
• Identifying relationships between ideas and practices,
• Establishing the context of the topic or problem,
• Rationalizing the significance of the problem,
• Enhancing and acquiring the subject vocabulary,
• Understanding the structure of the subject,
• Relating ideas and theory to applications,
• Identifying the main methodologies and research techniques that have been used, and
• Placing the research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments.

Another purpose for writing a literature review is that it provides a framework for relating new findings to previous findings in the discussion section of a dissertation. Without establishing the state of the previous research, it is impossible to establish how the new research advances the previous research.

There are some types of literature reviews which include:

• Argumentative Review: This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply embedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature.
• Integrative Review: Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated.
• Historical Review: Historical literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline.
• Methodological Review: A review does not always focus on what someone said [findings], but how they came about saying what they say [method of analysis]. Reviewing methods of analysis provides a framework of understanding at different levels [i.e. those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches, and data collection and analysis techniques], how researchers draw upon a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection, and data analysis.
• Systematic Review: This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review.
• Theoretical Review: The purpose of this form is to examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena.

In order to help the reviewer avoid mistakes in conducting a literature review, some of the most common mistakes are listed below. Gall, Borg, and Gall [1996] claim that the most frequent mistakes made in reviewing the literature are that the researcher:

• Does not clearly relate the findings of the literature review to the researcher’s own study
• Does not take sufficient time to define the best descriptors and identify the best sources to use in review literature related to one’s topic
• Relies on secondary sources rather than on primary sources in reviewing the literature;
• Uncritically accepts another researcher’s findings and interpretations as valid, rather than examining critically all aspects of the research design and analysis;
• Does not report the search procedures that were used in the literature review;
• Reports isolated statistical results rather than synthesizing them by chi-square or meta-analytic methods; and
• Does not consider contrary findings and alternative interpretations in synthesizing quantitative literature.

References

1. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. [1996]. Education research: An introduction [6th Ed.]. White Plains, NY: Longman.
2. Hart, C. [1998]. Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. London: Sage.

| ♦ Home | ♦ Journals | ♦ Instruction |

What Is a Literature Review | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples

Published on February 22, 2019 by Shona McCombes. Revised on February 4, 2022.

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research.

Writing a literature review involves finding relevant publications [such as books and journal articles], critically analyzing them, and explaining what you found. There are five key steps:

1. Search for relevant literature
2. Evaluate sources
3. Identify themes, debates and gaps
4. Outline the structure
5. Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes, and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Video liên quan