Amd e1 2100 setara dengan intel apa
|
Intel Core i3-3217U vs AMD E1-2100 ContentsGeneral info Comparing Core i3-3217U and E1-2100 processor market type (desktop or notebook),
architecture, sales start time and price.
Show
Technical specsCore i3-3217U and E1-2100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
CompatibilityInformation on Core i3-3217U and E1-2100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Technologies and extensionsTechnological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3217U and E1-2100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Security technologiesCore i3-3217U and E1-2100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Virtualization technologiesVirtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3217U and E1-2100 are enumerated here.
Memory specsTypes, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3217U and E1-2100. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Graphics specificationsGeneral parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Graphics interfacesAvailable interfaces and connections of Core i3-3217U and E1-2100 integrated GPUs.
PeripheralsSpecifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3217U and E1-2100.
Benchmark performanceVarious benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Benchmark coverage: 69% GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core. Benchmark coverage: 37% GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores. Benchmark coverage: 37% Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle. Benchmark coverage: 20% Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version. Benchmark coverage: 20% 3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package. Benchmark coverage: 19% wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor. Benchmark coverage: 18% Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads. Benchmark coverage: 14% Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources. Benchmark coverage: 14% Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources. Benchmark coverage: 14% TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 12% x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second. Benchmark coverage: 12% x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second. Benchmark coverage: 12% Advantages and disadvantages
Technical City couldn't decide between Intel Core i3-3217U and AMD E1-2100 We've got no test results to judge. Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3217U and E1-2100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU. Competitors of Core i3-3217U by AMDWe believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i3-3217U from AMD is A6-3400M, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 3 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i3-3217U: Similar processor comparisonsWe picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page. User ratingHere you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself. Rate Intel Core i3-3217U on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate AMD E1-2100 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about Core i3-3217U or E1-2100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. AMD E1 setara dengan intel berapa?Untuk diketahui, AMD E1 adalah salah satu prosesor besutan Advance Micro Device yang performa dan kinerjanya setara dengan Intel Core i3.
Apakah prosesor AMD E1 bagus untuk game?Walau hanya termasuk notebook dengan kelas entry-level, jangan anggap Notebook bertenaga AMD APU E1 ini tidak mampu memainkan game terkini.
Bagus mana AMD apa intel?Dari segi kualitas grafis AMD lebih unggul dibandingkan Intel. Hal ini disebabkan karena AMD biasanya memiliki lebih banyak core yang membuat kinerja processor menjadi lebih optimal untuk menghasilkan kualitas grafis yang lebih baik.
AMD E 300 setara dengan intel apa?Hp 3115m AMD APU E-300 setara intel Core i3 Gaming.
|
