Berapa harga ac huarui 1 4 pk 800 watt di jakarta
|
The cornerstone to my thinking about information literacy these days is this:
Information comes in many forms and flows through many channels. Information literacy then entails developing understandings of different forms and different channels, how and why it is put together, how and why it is distributed and received, how and why it is organized, and various issues of connection and context. So when we talk about media literacy we're talking about an aspect of information literacy. When we talk about visual literacy we're talking about a form of information. Digital literacy touches on both forms of information and channels it flows through. Forms and channels will evolve over time, so literacy is something that we are always developing. Show Domain literacy is a term I hadn't thought of before today, when I encountered Kin Lane's post, What I Mean When I Say Domain Literacy. But I have said in the past that knowing how to work on the web is as essential as knowing how to work with Word. That why I advocate for the Domain of One's Own initiative everywhere I go. Understanding domains is part of understanding information processes. It's part of understanding the value of information. It's part of understanding authority. And the best way to develop these understandings is to get your hands dirty working in your own domain. Some tell me that this is not a library issue, and perhaps they're right, but I say it ought to be. Robin DeRosa's article was filled with so many interesting ideas and stories that I am struggling with getting everything straight in my mind to put my own thoughts together, but I will do my best. She started off talking about the Digital Pedagogy Lab which holds a five day institute discussing aspects of digital teaching and learning in educational arenas, such in hybrid courses. What really caught my attention was when she spoke about University of Wisconsin at Madison Professor Sara Goldrick-Rab, who was critiscized and harrased for comments she made on Twitter. What she said isn't important for my response, even though I did take the time to look up the incidernt because I found it very interesting. It made me very angry to read how she was attacked for her opninions- granted she probably could have been more tactful with what she was saying, but the thing that upsets me is the way that people attack and harrass others for speaking their opinions in public and it to me is one of the downfalls of speaking about political or economical issues because people will always bring it to a personal level. The other thing that greatly interested me in the article was DeRosa's work in Open Educational Resources (OER) and her idea to further their work past just lowering textbook costs to include an effort to: "refigure the OER movement to champion open public networks as a learner-developed educational space." Meaning she wants to make textbooks and othwer material free and open-liscensed. She herself calls this radical and while as a student, I love the idea of not having to pay for textbooks, I agree that this is a radical notion that would be very difficult to make reality. She mentions that they would need a public commons that could support this and a way to share the cost of the labor it takes to produce these materials, and she admits that there really isn't a platform available yet for this. Still I like her ideals and hopes that there will be public spaces for teachers and students to lteach and learn without the financial control of these companies that are driven by profit and not by what is best for public education. I had trouble understanding exactly what the Institute and DeRosa are trying to do, but I still agree with a lot of the article and enjoyed reading it. You're Reading a Free Preview You're Reading a Free Preview You're Reading a Free Preview
You're Reading a Free Preview You're Reading a Free Preview You're
Reading a Free Preview You're Reading a Free Preview You're Reading a Free Preview You're Reading a Free Preview You're Reading a Free Preview AC yang bagus merk apa 2022?Merk AC Terbaik 2022. AC Daikin FTC 15NV14. ... . 2. AC Sharp Sayonara Panas Comfort Eco AH-A5UDL. ... . 3. AC Panasonic Premium Inverter CS-XU10VKP. ... . 4. AC Gree GWC-05MOO3. ... . AC LG Dual Cool Eco Inverter T10EV4. ... . 6. AC Samsung AR05TGHQASINSE. ... . 7. AC AUX ASW-09A4/FFR1. ... . AC Changhong CHOL-05L.. AC yang bagus merk apa ya?5 Rekomendasi Merk AC yang Bagus. Panasonic AC 1 PK. Merk AC terbaik pertama adalah Panasonic. ... . 2. Bestlife AC 1 PK. Merk AC terbaik lainnya juga datang dari brand Bestlife. ... . 3. LG AC ½ PK. LG merupakan salah satu brand elektronik cukup besar dan terkenal di kalangan masyarakat Indonesia. ... . Polytron AC ½ PK. ... . Sharp AC 1 Pk.. AC 1 PK murah merk apa?AC 1 PK Daikin R32 Split Standard. ... . 2. AC Sharp AH-A9UDL Split 1 PK. ... . 3. AC Gree GWC-09F1 Split 1 PK F1 Inverter. ... . 4. AC 1 PK Samsung AR10RYFHAWKNSE Split. ... . AC LG T10EV4 Split 1 PK Dual Cool Eco. ... . 6. Polytron PAC09VG2 Deluxe 2. ... . 7. AC Beko BSVOA 091 Spilt 1 PK. ... . AC Panasonic CS-PU9UKP Standard Inverter.. Apa beda AC Inverter dan tidak?Perbedaan utama antara unit AC inverter dan unit non-inverter adalah kecepatan kompresor. Untuk menghemat konsumsi energi, unit inverter dapat menurunkan kecepatan kompresornya setelah suhu ruangan mencapai suhu yang disetel pada termostat.
|
